I'll start, and then I'll let Mathieu finish.
I didn't get to all the comments, and I appreciate this very much.
First of all, we are not asking for something that has not been established in other countries. As I mentioned in the brief that was submitted, the U.K., Australia and Norway also have working codes of conduct that are voluntary.
Indeed, if you read the U.K. report, the yearly report that the auditor puts out, it is actually serving consumers, retailers and processors well. What they've seen is a net decrease in food pricing within the marketplace.
What it will allow us to do as a processor is to not get sidelined or tripped up by an arbitrary decision.
I want to put it into context. If one of our retailers decides that they need a new warehouse computer system, they have levied those costs against us. They have levied their costs against modernization of the redesign of their stores. Where do processors go to be able to recover that? We cannot go right back to the individuals who are levying that. It has created such an uncertainty that the concept of being able to invest for innovation is grinding to a halt and we need processing in Canada to support our producers.
I'll turn it over to....
I'm sorry.