Thank you, Mr. Chair.
Thank you to Mr. Lawrence.
I supported your bill, but for different reasons. I had a made a commitment to farmers back home and I thought I would honour that commitment.
You had a chat with Mr. MacGregor with regard to paragraph (f) and paragraph (c) of eligible farming activity. Interpretation of the law and how somebody views that is important. Do you not see the conundrum that could create because of the lack of clarity that you present in your bill or section versus another section? Somebody could take the government to court—the David Suzukis of the world or other organizations—saying that the Government of Canada is wrong and the interpretation is wrong. They'd bring us to court and then they'd side on the particular heating and cooling aspect of the bill.
Did you have those conversations with certain groups when you drafted the bill?