That's very insightful. You said that the risk for this type of activity could be quite low, that it's not particularly clear. In response to another member's question, you said the offence would be tough to prove.
The very purpose of the bill is to punish trespassers on a preventative basis. The idea is to prevent biosecurity hazards.
Would it not be a good idea, as a precautionary measure—and I know this can be tough to prove scientifically speaking—to raise the penalties to deter the behaviour? Just think about all that's at stake: food safety, farmers' mental health, privacy, and the prevention of unfortunate circumstances resulting from the unwanted presence of individuals on farms, not to mention the fact that the farm owners are very aggrieved by the situation.