Thank you for that.
Bill C-205, in that first clause, makes reference to “a building or other enclosed place in which animals are kept”.
In your mind, if we had a hypothetical scenario where protestors did gain access to a farm property but did not come anywhere close to animals, is that where provincial laws would be applicable and not this federal act? I guess that's where the jurisdictional waters have the potential of being muddied in that hypothetical situation.
Do you have any comments on that?