I understand what you are saying and I also feel that way sometimes. Thank you.
From what we heard from the witnesses who appeared, the problem is that the current regulations, whether they are provincial or federal, force producers to establish proof as to the consequences of the intrusion, which can be difficult to do. For example, if a disease appears sometime after the intrusion, it's very difficult to make the connection between the two.
Don't you think that if just being on farm property became a violation, that might simplify the job? If that mere presence could be punished, couldn't the problem be avoided?