Mr. Chair, let me make my intentions clear.
As it stands with the current amendment by Ms. Rood, I would not be able to support it. If she would like to withdraw her amendment and instead reinsert, under the aspect of whether entering a place or taking in the animal or thing, “could reasonably result in the exposure of”, then I'll support that.
If she wants to take the glory, she can. If not, she knows where I stand.