I think it's hard to estimate (a) what the volume of those benefits would be and (b) what the value is, because we don't have a defined market mechanism to help us assign value to that—outside of carbon. We have seen the price on carbon. That is probably one of the easiest EG&S values to quantify. Although it's not easy, it's probably the easiest in the bunch.
I would suggest that what we can do in Canada is be better at collaborating. I think too often the research that's done is a little bit too vertical. It needs to be more horizontal. We need to learn to share datasets more effectively, because we are much more powerful together. Just having bits and pieces of the story sitting next to one another—that doesn't help us shape the market mechanism that we need to truly maximize the value of EG&S.
