Thank you.
Mr. Guénette, upon examining the issue, we realize that there are no viable alternatives in the short term. However, there could be innovation and research.
You said earlier that you wanted an exemption rather than a reimbursement, because reimbursements are partial and complex to obtain, most of the time. Indeed, we know how much paperwork there is when dealing with the government, whether it's the Canadian government or someone else. I say this without judgment.
How do we maintain the message that we need to reduce the ecological footprint? The idea of pricing pollution is an important and promising one. How do we keep the message alive?
Would a sunset clause be a viable compromise?