Yes and no. Yes, it is safer, because you're looking at a smaller aircraft with smaller capacity. If there is an incident where you'd have a crash or something like that, you don't have a life that could possibly be lost. We had a close call up in the London-Kitchener area, where a pilot had a mechanical failure and crashed his helicopter, so that's part of it.
The second is environmental conditions. We don't carry 250 gallons of product in the air. If you have a failure, you could have that as an environmental risk. We have a reduced amount with the smaller capacities. There are a lot of factors involved in this that make it a safer application.
We fly a lot closer to the crops. It's all GPS-controlled and mapped. We have lidar systems, radars and sensors. Everything is very well controlled. You don't have to worry about human error; the sensors don't lie if they're reading properly. There are a lot of safety protocols involved in this. If you operate safely and effectively, there's less risk of an incident happening.
