Thank you very much for your question.
I'll respond in English if you don't mind, because of the economic vocabulary in English.
Our enforcement mandate is not really to regulate the inequality of bargaining power. Our focus is really on whether the big guys are being big and bad. Are they doing something that would stop the vigour of their customers or their suppliers to compete? We believe it's the competitive process that gives us the benefit of lower prices, so we're not here to protect competitors within the system but to protect the process that leads to those outcomes.
Where there is inequality of bargaining power, we have to look at the contributing factors to that. Are there regulatory barriers that are making it more difficult or that are impeding the competing positions of the parties? That's where our work to advocate for reducing those public restraints on competition comes in. Although we don't really get in the middle of those negotiations and an inequality of bargaining power, we are there to protect the process to make sure that they don't face constraints in their ability to compete in the market.