To push back on that a little bit more, it's how they are being addressed. We heard in testimony at the last committee—let's take the PMRA, for example—that they touted that their performance standards were 69% or 79% while the EPA, another trusted jurisdiction, was only 29%. Can you talk about whether we're talking about apples and oranges?
In the first round today, we heard that the EPA is dealing with 58,000 actives, whereas Canada is only dealing with 8,000. Is that a function of workload? Is it a function of comparing apples and apples? I'm trying to get my head around why we seemingly can't get progress on harmonization.