Thank you very much, Mr. Northey.
Mrs. Chatel did raise an important point at the beginning of her remarks about recommendations. The problem is often related to the accumulation of measures or standards. Each requirement, taken individually, may be perfectly logical.
How can we ensure that we don't remove requirements that are important?
Let's take an example. Mr. Innes, you mentioned dicamba, which is currently under review. Correct me if I'm wrong, but if I understand correctly, this is a re-evaluation of a product that was already approved. Now we're being told that new data suggests this product could pose a health threat, and that may well be true.
How can we strike a balance and not be too quick to withdraw a product that our farmers need? On the other hand, we can't allow farmers to continue using a product if it's harmful.
I'm not drawing any conclusions. We're here to ask questions, together.
I'd like to hear your comments on this, Mr. Innes.