There's nothing specific in the bill that would suggest there's a double payment. It would depend on the facts of a given case.
To the extent that an entity providing a service is able to benefit from the hosting safe harbour under clause 35, which would be amended by Liberal 11, they would be sheltered from liability for the activities covered by that hosting safe harbour.
So it really would depend on the facts, in terms of the type of service they're providing, the types of acts they're engaging in, and the involvement in terms of the content, etc.