I'd rather not get into ranking in importance the factors in CCH. I was really using it to make the point that so far, what the courts are going to do with this is very uncertain. Clearly the appeals court and the Copyright Board had a certain view of what copying would be about, and they saw the aggregate view. They saw what a lot of copying would do to the market.
The educators have appealed more than once. Currently they're in appeal to the Supreme Court on this matter. My point was that it's not for the courts to decide; it's for Parliament. It's just too significant. The potential for uncertainty in the market and loss of income to the publishers and to the writers is simply too great. This bill is going to pass before anything is heard from the Supreme Court—