Sorry, what I mean is if the rule would be that you're allowed to circumvent for a lawful purpose, for a non-infringing purpose, is there a distinction between that and what you're suggesting?
On March 6th, 2012. See this statement in context.
On March 6th, 2012. See this statement in context.
Liberal
Geoff Regan Liberal Halifax West, NS
Sorry, what I mean is if the rule would be that you're allowed to circumvent for a lawful purpose, for a non-infringing purpose, is there a distinction between that and what you're suggesting?
See context to find out what was said next.