Sorry, what I mean is if the rule would be that you're allowed to circumvent for a lawful purpose, for a non-infringing purpose, is there a distinction between that and what you're suggesting?
On March 6th, 2012. See this statement in context.
On March 6th, 2012. See this statement in context.
March 6th, 2012 / 11:25 a.m.
Liberal
Geoff Regan Liberal Halifax West, NS
Sorry, what I mean is if the rule would be that you're allowed to circumvent for a lawful purpose, for a non-infringing purpose, is there a distinction between that and what you're suggesting?
See context to find out what was said next.