We still recognize that there is a limit on the power of publication, that is to say that it is sometimes in the interests of justice to delay it. Publishing interventions could undermine the judicial process.
Here you have chosen a model in which the Attorney General and the DPP can both delay publication. That's similar to what you have in British Columbia. Upon lengthy debate, we chose a model like that of Nova Scotia, under which the DPP can delay publication since it's considered that giving the power... In any case, I'll come back to that if you have any questions.
The last thing I wanted to mention concerns language. I was a bit surprised by the wording of subsection 3(3) of the Director of Public Prosecutions Act. It states, and I quote:
(3) Il exerce, sous l’autorité et pour le compte du procureur général, les attributions suivantes : a) engager et mener les poursuites pour le compte de l’État;
I find that ambiguous. On the one hand, we want to describe the fact that he is subordinated to the Attorney General, but, on the other hand, it states that he works under and on behalf of... You're using the same word. Moreover, I see the English version has the same effect. Perhaps that's not ambiguous in your mind, but it is for me with regard to the fundamental aspect of his duties. I'm sorry.