I just have one point, Chair. I appreciate the comments made in light of the fact that the previous amendment, NDP-19, did not pass, so the scope I hoped it would have captured is gone.
I'm curious, Mr. Wild, if there were reprisals against someone who was not a public servant but was related to someone who had suffered from reprisals, because of relationship or because they reported—as Mr. Owen said, anyone can report.... It's not out of the realm of possibility that one could suffer reprisals as a result of having disclosed. If that scenario were to happen, I'm just curious what protections would be afforded someone in that instance.