That's fair comment. Certainly I think that is exactly what we have been doing since 1995 with the high-risk offender working group, which is a committee of senior justice officials from across the country. Its works first culminated in the 1997 changes to the Criminal Code that brought in the long-term offender. I think most experts would agree that this has been a highly successful program in managing the risk of offences to Canadians.
Post-Johnson, the same committee has been working hard to identify resolutions to the problems created by that decision in the lower courts. This bill is the fruit of a lot of that labour.
I would also suggest that, again, every time something like that happens, there are certain pressures on Justice Canada to take a look to see if it might trigger further analysis or a further issue that we're concerned about.