There is no support.
What's also clear is that if people are forced at this point to choose between reform and abolition, there are important differences across the country and important partisan differences. New Democrats tend to support abolition, Quebeckers tend to support abolition more than reform, and western Canadians support reform more. So there are differences, and it's not a clear-cut call which way Canadians would go. I think part of the reason it's not clear-cut is that the options themselves are not well understood by people.
The second point has to do with the role of the premiers in this. One of the difficult things about Senate reform is that everyone who counts, everyone who has to agree, loses. An elected Senate would in some way affect the status of MPs, right? You would not be the only elected body. There would be senators, and in fact in some ways they would represent larger constituencies; there'd be fewer of them; they might seem to be more powerful. So MPs lose. The existing senators lose. The premiers lose because there are now competitors, in terms of speaking for Alberta, speaking for Saskatchewan. And the Prime Minister loses because—