The honourable member says he trusts the crown discretion and goes on to talk about applications falling through the cracks. I fail to see where Bill C-27 advances us in that regard. He further states that applications would look the same. If the applications are going to look the same and be the same, then why table this aspect of Bill C-27 at all?
If they're going to be the same, let's exist with the system that is presently working. If the honourable member is worried about applications falling through the cracks, he can speak to the crown attorneys about creating a policy. But he need not table legislation in Canada's Parliament to make sure they're doing their job.