I do have some concerns, and quite frankly, Mr. Cullen, that was not a bad start. But my first concern is in relation to the two-year window. Just having been in this place for three years now, I see how slowly government moves, and I'm wondering about approved projects and other scenarios. Most large final emitters have 25-year forecasts, and that's their business model. They don't allocate funds for some three or four years, depending on the project. They do cost analysis and stuff. So I think the two-year window is certainly too short.
As well, I'm wondering where the Liberals came up with the amount of 80% of the funds to be spent in projects within an area. First of all, why would it be 80%? Why would it not be 100%? Secondly, why would there be a “territorial-provincial” approach instead of a “sector” approach? If they put the money in from the auto sector, why wouldn't it be spent back on the auto sector and give them an opportunity to forecast that over a period of five or six years? So those are my questions in relation to both.