It is clear, but what I am saying is that we are indirectly going about doing something that we cannot do directly. Indeed, we are dealing with energy-using products which can, indeed, come under federal jurisdiction, allowing the federal government to intervene indirectly in the area of overall energy consumption.
Let us say that the precautionary principle is what guides me in energy matters when these are being dealt with in the framework of federal legislation.
If I understood correctly, you are in favour of this amendment. Is that correct?