Actually, this is one of the questions we had when we reviewed the motion. How do you define “international best practices” in that industry? Japan has some standards; the EU is moving with some standards; we know about California. But how do you define “international best practices”?
The second thing is the commitment to “meet or exceed international best practices”. There's movement in the world in terms of standards, so what happens if that standard changes and gets better? Would we have to constantly adjust to the international best practices?
It's quite challenging to go with that type of wording. A preamble is supposed to give some guidance to the legislation, and that would be very difficult.