The issue of border tax adjustments has come on the table on several occasions, but I think it would be very fair to summarize the debate, in particular in the European Parliament, on border tax adjustments as between those that have signed up to Kyoto and those that have not yet signed up to Kyoto, so there's a distinction there.
Second, the European commission responsible for trade matters has made clear in its statements after January 10 that we have to look first at positive trade measures, and that these border tax adjustments have to be looked at in a very long-term perspective. I see this coming up as an element of the debate.
Very important on the compliance issues in the European context is that when we have emissions trading, we have liberty for a company either to buy allowances at home or to import them in terms of CDM. Now, this import of CDM credits is very important in terms of compliance issues, because we now have a liquid market for these credits. If a company risks not being in compliance, there is a cost-effective way to go into compliance: you turn to the market and ask some traders or brokers to cater for a number of credits. These JI and CDM credits have turned out to be a very cost-effective way of bringing your company into compliance.