I think the Copyright Board decision was based on the concept of fair dealing for the purpose of research. In that perspective, I don't think we can assume that a similar approach, a similar outcome, would derive from an analysis based on fair dealing for the purpose of education. I think this is one important consideration we have as a distinction with this new fair dealing provision.
On the other hand, I must say I'm not against all fair dealing. I think the fair dealing purposes we have now are perfectly acceptable. Indeed, I find fair dealing for the purpose of parody or satire, which is being added by the bill, to be a perfectly commendable purpose for fair dealing.
What I'm saying is that it is difficult to say 100% that with a new, added purpose in the act, the Copyright Board will necessarily come up with the same conclusion it did with respect to fair dealing for the purpose of research.