Okay. I say this at my own peril, but I think we're all trying to get to the same place. We're trying to figure out which dates work for everybody.
Technically, we can deal with your proposed amendment, dispose of that, move on to another amendment and then get back to the main motion in whatever form that ultimately takes.
I'm proposing that it's easier if we can discuss the dates that are being bandied around the table by the three parties and try to land on that without wasting a whole lot of time on procedure. I think we're this close, so I'm throwing that out there, if people are prepared to do it that way.
We can at least hear what Ms. Desrochers has to say before you say no. Can we do that?