On the premise of your question or the preamble of your question, 27 projects and strategies have been referred to the Major Projects Office. I understand that you're focusing on one that has been added to the schedule.
More good news is on the way, and more is coming soon, but a number of projects have already begun construction, thanks to the work of the Major Projects Office in bringing a greater coherence to the federal approval process without needing to have recourse to the schedule. I think it's important to mention that.
Again, I understand that you're focusing on proposed section 19, but as Steven said, the intent and the plain reading of the language, from our perspective, is precisely the opposite: It's to bring greater certainty than there was before this legislation was introduced.
Let's assume that we're lucky, that Canada's lucky, and it is adopted. The ability to stop the clock, to have somebody go on holidays and say when they get back to some proponent, “You know what? Your project is missing schedule D,” and all of that has built a certain frustration and uncertainty that people have talked to us about across the country for projects big and small. We think this legislation is in fact a very appropriate answer to the exact concern that you've identified.