I think that is an excellent suggestion. It's one that merits research in terms of the approval, as you say, by right. In other words, if in fact it is approved until it's not approved, and if in fact the regulators.... It has to be the regulators, not the proponent. The proponent is responsible for slowing the progress. They bear that responsibility, but if in fact it's the regulators who flout the law and fail to meet timelines, it is approved. I think that's very much worth a discussion going forward.
I want to go back, though, to one of the reasons Bill C-5 and Bill C-39 were put in place. It was because of some of the disruptions that occurred. Could you describe the chaotic business environment that was created by this government's failure to manage certainty in the economy?