Thanks, everyone, for the time today.
First off, I agree with all the points provided by Stewart. I've seen those become growing trends during my career in banking.
I want to add one additional remark. Nature risk is financial risk. When nature is degraded, it increasingly shows up on the balance sheets of corporations, investors and governments. We've seen this play out in Canada with wildfires that shut down Fort McMurray or burned down entire towns, and flooding that paralyzes our big cities. These aren't just environmental events. They're economic disruptions with real costs to infrastructure, supply chains, workers and communities.
That's why protecting nature is also a matter of national security. The World Economic Forum ranks ecosystem harm and biodiversity loss as the second-greatest global risk over the next decade. Adding nature-positive outcomes in our project approvals ensures that we don't add further risk to our country, infrastructure and economy, and that the major projects we build can stand the test of time.
Thank you.
