I think that's a really excellent question and one that gets to some of the, if I dare say it, myths that are being communicated on these issues on behalf of the employer community.
I represent, obviously, the employer community, the businesses that are doing this bargaining. It is inaccurate to conclude that an employer is waiting for the government to bail them out. Employers do not want collective bargaining settled through binding arbitration, full stop. For us, it's a failure in the process when we get to that point. It's better than the alternative of allowing a highly consequential work stoppage to occur in a critical supply chain space, but employers want to bargain with unions. They want to bargain in good faith. They want to settle on terms with the union in a full partnership that results in a win-win solution.
Employers and companies want certainty. They want stability. This process that we've been living through in the last few years with the invocation of section 107 has actually resulted in more instability. None of that is good for the employer. It's not what we want. We want a process that incentivizes better collective bargaining and gets the parties to deals without government intervention. Government intervention, for us, is a last resort when all else has failed.