Certainly, it's always our intention to move forward in meeting all standards with respect to projects. We have the greatest success in delivering projects on federal lands and waters that we have direct influence over and on which we can work with our federal colleagues to make sure they are permitted in a time frame. Strictly speaking, some of the supporting infrastructure that is necessary to meet our trade objectives is, of course, outside of the port's jurisdiction, in municipalities.
We have had the greatest success where municipalities have been interested in and capable of delivering, in partnership with Canada and the port authority, the infrastructure that will enhance road or rail capabilities. Where we struggle is where we don't have that partnership.
We have examples of where we've moved forward. We have the Holdom overpass, a $250-million piece of infrastructure that's enabling trade for potash, coal and grain to Vancouver's north shore. The municipality gets a tremendous benefit out of that.
If we have a municipality that is not interested, that's going to stand in the way of Canada meeting its objectives, and that's what we need to address.