On principle, yes, we support the notion of additional powers. There was a reference to this during the process of actually going through the inquiry commission itself, where the ILWU made a link between that and the ability to compel CEOs of our member companies to the bargaining table. That issue was squarely examined and dismissed by the inquiry commission in question as being irrelevant because the BCMEA is properly structured to carry out its responsibilities under the Canada Labour Code.
That said, every effort needs to be made, and every tool needs to be used to try to achieve negotiated agreements at the table. We need better tools to support meaningful bargaining and to reach durable agreements. We believe Bill C-39 provides some of those tools. The goal of the special mediator is to provide the parties with additional resources and a fresh perspective—essentially, to try to get to a different place. It adds additional pressure.
Yes, while the bill does not have those additional powers you're referring to—named in section 84 of the Labour Code—we can't dismiss or downplay the significance of the transparency effect with the issuance of a report. I think that has the ability to influence parties in terms of their motivations and how they conduct themselves at the table. I think it's a good first step.