Yes, and that was going to be my question. Who is paying for it, and what is, as Mr. Genuis remarked earlier, the quid pro quo attached to it?
Are there any other issues? I know that Waterloo had publicly issued its desire to know, from our security establishment, what parameters they should have when they're doing contracts with certain companies. At the time I asked, they said they had not heard anything back.
Should there be a public display of these things, in terms of what the policies should be? Should the government be developing those policies and giving that insight? Where appropriate, should the government be funding those kinds of cases when these contracts are having to be cut?