Thank you, Chair.
I suppose this is indirectly related to the amendment, if you'll indulge me here for a moment.
I see that we're straying away. We're now debating which witnesses are appropriate and which are not. That's the purview, as we all know, of the subcommittee. Can I suggest what I thought was originally the case, which was that we would have two meetings to begin with and then the subcommittee would meet to finalize a work plan? At that point, once finalized there, it would be brought back to the committee for discussion.
We now have two minutes left in this meeting. I don't think we're going to resolve anything. Can we at least—I put this to Mr. Genuis and maybe he'll consider amending his initial motion—agree to have the first two meetings and leave it at that for now, just so we can get on with things in a meaningful way here? I just see us descending into an endless debate.