Evidence of meeting #5 for Canada-China Relations in the 43rd Parliament, 2nd Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was immigration.

A video is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Natasha Kim  Associate Assistant Deputy Minister, Strategic and Program Policy, Department of Citizenship and Immigration
Nicole Giles  Associate Assistant Deputy Minister, Operations, Department of Citizenship and Immigration

7:15 p.m.

Liberal

Marco Mendicino Liberal Eglinton—Lawrence, ON

Thank you.

7:15 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Geoff Regan

Thank you very much, Mr. Bergeron.

Now we have Ms. Kwan for six minutes.

Go ahead, please, Ms. Kwan.

November 16th, 2020 / 7:15 p.m.

NDP

Jenny Kwan NDP Vancouver East, BC

Thank you very much, Mr. Chair.

Thank you, Minister.

I'd like to just build on that last question. Hong Kong police have reportedly been instigating violence during the Hong Kong protests, and there are no guarantees of any actual merit to charges laid for rioting, which may be considered a crime in Canada.

Can the minister confirm that the Hong Kong protesters who were arrested or facing charges for rioting or illegal assembly prior to the passage of the national security law will not be deemed inadmissible?

7:15 p.m.

Liberal

Marco Mendicino Liberal Eglinton—Lawrence, ON

I understand the finer point you're putting on the question, Ms. Kwan, and, again, I appreciate it. I would simply reiterate the principle that no one will be deemed inadmissible simply because they have been charged under the national security law or if they have not committed what would be considered a crime under Canadian law. Those are well-established principles. They have served us well.

7:15 p.m.

NDP

Jenny Kwan NDP Vancouver East, BC

I realize that those are the talking points of the minister, but I just want to bring to the minister's attention that according to Hong Kong Watch, around 10,000 Hong Kong protesters had been arrested prior to the passage of the national security law, and approximately 40% of those were students. Right now, as I understand it, about 400 of those have been charged with rioting. I'm very worried about whether or not those individuals would actually qualify and be able to apply for asylum and would not be deemed inadmissible. I ask the minister to consider this and to make the necessary changes to ensure that Hong Kongers actually get the support they need. The answer the minister provided does not provide clarity at all.

The government says that it supports the people of Hong Kong, yet in the minister's announcement last week there were no refugee measures for those who are still in Hong Kong who fear persecution because of their participation in pro-democracy protests and rallies. So why did the minister not provide any refugee measures for these pro-democracy asylum seekers? Is it because of the threats made by the Chinese ambassador?

7:15 p.m.

Liberal

Marco Mendicino Liberal Eglinton—Lawrence, ON

Ms. Kwan, we make decisions that are in the best interests of Canada, and with respect I would say that the two policies that I announced are there to enhance the protections for those who have simply exercised their rights—including peaceful protesters—which will not be a bar. Those were concerns expressed by the community. Those concerns are reflected in the two policies that were part of our announcement last week.

7:15 p.m.

NDP

Jenny Kwan NDP Vancouver East, BC

Well, the measures are very limiting. As the minister knows, groups like Canada-Hong Kong Link, Toronto Association for Democracy in China, and Alliance Canada Hong Kong are pointing out that there are many who are under imminent risk of political persecution but who do not qualify under the new stream. So will the minister initiate a special refugee measure for the people who are currently located in Hong Kong and do not qualify under the new measures?

7:15 p.m.

Liberal

Marco Mendicino Liberal Eglinton—Lawrence, ON

As I said, Ms. Kwan, and I think you know, Canada's work on the international stage when it comes to granting asylum is second to none. We have been recognized by the United Nations and others. The immigration plan that I tabled more than two weeks ago ensures that there are additional allocations for refugees—and we will continue to show leadership in this area—in addition to the two policy enhancements that were announced last week.

7:20 p.m.

NDP

Jenny Kwan NDP Vancouver East, BC

Surely the minister must recognize that the people in Hong Kong right now can't get to Canada to apply for asylum. That is the problem. So if you do not create a special refugee stream, they cannot access it. I'm going to leave it at that. I know the minister is reciting talking points, but I think he knows what I'm talking about. Again, I urge the minister to consider bringing in special refugee measures for the people who are in Hong Kong right now.

The minister also knows that the family reunification stream applies to spouses, partners and dependent children. Parent and grandparent reunification is subject to the luck of the draw. Will the minister expand the scope of family reunification to include extended family members such as siblings, aunts, uncles and cousins?

7:20 p.m.

Liberal

Marco Mendicino Liberal Eglinton—Lawrence, ON

Just before I answer that, very quickly, I will say that notwithstanding COVID-era travel restrictions, which are necessary for the security of Canadians, we are still resettling the most urgent cases. My colleague Ms. Kwan knows that.

In addition to that, we have announced 40,000 allocated spots under the parent and grandparent program. That is the most in any two-year period, and we will certainly look forward to the processing of those applications to reunite more families than ever.

7:20 p.m.

NDP

Jenny Kwan NDP Vancouver East, BC

Canada used to have an immigration stream that allowed for siblings to sponsor one another to come to Canada. By the way, that's how my family came from Hong Kong. My aunt sponsored me.

Will the minister consider bringing back a program like that to allow for siblings and other extended family members to sponsor their loved ones to come to Canada?

7:20 p.m.

Liberal

Marco Mendicino Liberal Eglinton—Lawrence, ON

Let me just pause to say that I'm glad she did sponsor you.

I will say that it has never been easier for families to reunite. We have put an additional emphasis on processing sponsorship applications to demonstrate our commitment to family reunification, and, notwithstanding the challenges of COVID-19, we are making progress. We've added resources. We're leveraging technology. From where we were in March to where we are now, we have made progress.

However, Ms. Kwan, I acknowledge that there is still more work to be done.

7:20 p.m.

NDP

Jenny Kwan NDP Vancouver East, BC

I hope the minister will do more than what has been announced, because as everyone has heard, the program that the minister has announced is particularly limiting. Some of the youth, by the way, who are facing potential arrest, have not completed their high school and so they would not qualify. Some of them are not students.

Will the minister consider bringing in additional measures to really support the people of Hong Kong who have been left out by these things?

7:20 p.m.

Liberal

Marco Mendicino Liberal Eglinton—Lawrence, ON

Ms. Kwan, in addition to our plan, we've announced this initiative that I think is a way in which we can expand opportunities. It speaks to the opportunities that you described.

7:20 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Geoff Regan

Thank you, Minister. Thank you, Ms. Kwan.

Now we'll go to the second round.

I believe it's Ms. Dancho, for five minutes this time.

7:20 p.m.

Conservative

Raquel Dancho Conservative Kildonan—St. Paul, MB

Thank you, Mr. Chair.

Minister, you just said something interesting. You said, “it has never been easier for families to reunite.” I'm wondering if the protesters outside of your office might disagree with that.

Anyway, Minister, you've also said repeatedly during this committee today, and also previously, that no one will be prohibited from claiming asylum or applying to any other immigration program solely by virtue of having been charged under China's national security law. We know that there are only a few dozen people who have been charged under the national security law, but over 10,000 were arrested and 2,000 charged for protesting, which many believe is politically motivated from the Communist Party of China.

Will those charged under other protest-related charges, excluding the national security law, be permitted to come to Canada, as per your announcement last week?

7:20 p.m.

Liberal

Marco Mendicino Liberal Eglinton—Lawrence, ON

Again, I think we're going over covered ground, Ms. Dancho.

There are principles that are well in place that ensure no one will be disqualified from making a claim to our asylum system if they have not been charged, as well as a much broader set of conduct where one may be exercising their right to protest but that does not amount to a crime known to Canadian law. With respect to—

7:20 p.m.

Conservative

Raquel Dancho Conservative Kildonan—St. Paul, MB

On that exact point, Minister, that's my next question.

Protesters in Hong Kong have been charged, for example, with rioting, unlawful assembly and uttering seditious words. All three of these laws are laws in Canada. As a result, and as per your remarks just now, will these protesters be denied entry into Canada?

7:20 p.m.

Liberal

Marco Mendicino Liberal Eglinton—Lawrence, ON

Ms. Dancho, all I can do, again, is reiterate what the principle is. It is not for me to adjudicate that admissibility screening. That is a function that is performed, as you would well expect, by our public safety branch, and so—

7:20 p.m.

Conservative

Raquel Dancho Conservative Kildonan—St. Paul, MB

I understand, but you know the rules. Those are Canadian laws as well. Would they not be permitted? Would they not be allowed in Canada, then, just under what you've just said? You know the rules, so....

7:25 p.m.

Liberal

Marco Mendicino Liberal Eglinton—Lawrence, ON

Ms. Dancho, I do know the rules, and I have been explaining them on a number of occasions now. They will be applied very rigorously by our public safety branch to protect the safety and security of the Canadian people.

7:25 p.m.

Conservative

Raquel Dancho Conservative Kildonan—St. Paul, MB

All right. Well, we'll just go on.

I've heard from many pro-democracy activists here in Canada that a number of activists on the front lines in Hong Kong, following an arrest and participating in protests, often have their travel documents taken from them by the Chinese communist security forces. Grandma Wong is an example of this. There are many others. What is your plan to help those without travel documents, or those who are barred from leaving Hong Kong and China, to get to Canada, to safety?

7:25 p.m.

Liberal

Marco Mendicino Liberal Eglinton—Lawrence, ON

First, I would just point out, as you heard me say earlier in answer to Ms. Yip, that our consul general and all of our staff at the office in Hong Kong stand at the ready.

In addition to that, under our modernized system, we have an electronic travel authorization that can be obtained literally in minutes, which is one way in which people will be able to move from Hong Kong back to Canada if they are eligible under one of the existing pathways, or under the initiative that I announced last week.

7:25 p.m.

Conservative

Raquel Dancho Conservative Kildonan—St. Paul, MB

All right. Hong Kongers with no family in Canada, though, cannot get to Canada to apply for asylum right now, due to the COVID-19 travel restrictions, obviously. They need documents to travel here, and tourism is of course forbidden, so are you planning to allow NGOs, for example, to provide travel documents to people stuck in Hong Kong, just like you did, for example, for gay Iranians and Chechens in years past?

7:25 p.m.

Liberal

Marco Mendicino Liberal Eglinton—Lawrence, ON

Well, thank you for highlighting ways in which we have demonstrated leadership on the world stage when it comes to upholding human rights—