If I can just elaborate a little on my previous answer, I would just note that one of the differences between how the U.S. enforces the law and how we enforce the law is that the U.S. does, in fact, provide specific guidance on the evidence required to rebut a presumption of whether or not the imported goods involve forced labour. That evidence can be given through human rights due diligence. If the company has conducted human rights due diligence, that can rebut the evidence, as can their supply chain mapping.
Again, I would just say, as I said in my opening statement, that it would be helpful for Canada to put in place human rights due diligence legislation.