I'll take that first.
There has been a lot of discussion about a national railway museum. Many organizations such as ours have significant parts of our collection that tell a national story, and we would want to be part of what you might call a satellite of these important collections. Perhaps a major facility like Exporail could be designated the national centre for this collection, with a satellite of some other important collections linked to it.
I think the federal government has a very important role in providing part of the capital assistance for improvements to museums—not necessarily new museums but certainly improvements to those collections that tell a national story—while working with provincial and federal agencies, yes.
The operational aspect is a much more difficult question. When you break operations down into conservation, which is a particular part of a museum's operations, that is over and above what most people ever have to do, because they're conserving artifacts that return to the earth if they're not looked after. Therefore, the environmental controls, the relative humidity, and security are all extraordinary costs that we put in our budget as conservation costs, which are different from operations and different from capital.