An article was drawn to my attention that came out a little while back in the Ottawa Citizen looking at the distribution of funding for Canada Day. It seemed to be quite disproportionate in terms of how some of the funding was spent, at least according to the newspaper article. Eighty percent of the money was in ridings of the governing party at the time—which would have been the previous government—even though they held only 43% of the ridings. I'm wondering whether that kind of thing is something you look at when you do your reports, whether it's something you review.
On June 15th, 2006. See this statement in context.