If I may respond to that question, there is one item that doesn't involve money. It's on the last page of our brief, if I may read it to you:
Simplified, Speedier Reporting Systems.
The demands now placed on programs for accountability and efficiency are resulting in significant delays for all museums. The present administrative system is inefficient and produces delays that are costly and de-moralizing. While we all appreciate the need for appropriate controls, the present system is one of over control and is costly and inefficient. New ways of delivering programs to museums need to be considered including an arms' length approach, which works very successfully in some provinces for museum programs (e.g. Alberta and Saskatchewan). Assessments and recommendations from peer juries should remain as an essential element in any new funding system.
So that's something that would not cost any more money but would make life an awful lot better for museums and for, as you mentioned, students and people who are trying to enhance their careers and their futures.