In terms of your initial comment, madame, there are differences between violence against women and, I would say, regulating violent content on television.
We have over 1,000 members, so we're not all going to agree on how you define civil liberties, but traditionally speaking, civil libertarians believe that state intervention is only necessary when it's to prevent harm. In the case of violence against women, definitely there was harm. I don't think there are very many civil libertarians who would say yes, let's go and beat women--although I can't speak for all of them.
In this particular situation, as I said earlier, if there were a proven causal link between violent content on television and increase of crime—