On a point of order, Mr. Chair, that's totally inappropriate.
What Mr. Regan is trying to do is dig into the personal life of Mr. Patrone and avoid focusing on the qualifications he brings to this job. We've already established that this is a review under Standing Orders 110 and 111. It's appropriate for Mr. Regan to address questions to Mr. Patrone on his qualifications. I think we're already starting to diverge from that.