I have the same answer to your question. We all have the same position. We're talking about two things. On the one hand, things have to be rebalanced between broadcasters, specialty and general interest networks. We also think that consumers should not have to absorb the costs. In our proposal, it's not the consumer who absorbs the costs. We're saying that there has to be a minimum basic service and we have to create greater free choice for consumers, which will mean that the overall cost to consumers will remain low and a rebalancing will occur between those that have to receive fees.
On May 1st, 2008. See this statement in context.