But if you're already negative on your cashflow, you must be getting that $103 million from your subscribers. So then your subscribers.... Of course, we've heard from broadcasters that you're making money on their backs, that you're not giving them anything, and that people think they're paying for it anyways.
If you're not positive on cashflow, then obviously your subscribers are already paying what would amount to about $6 a month, so they are in fact paying for local broadcasting. Ultimately, for these funds that you're paying into, they're being passed on to your subscribers. Is that not correct?