Once again, I will be answering in my own language.
I think a basic or a foundation service should reflect what Canada and Quebec really are ensemble. And we have as one of our members APTN, the Aboriginal Peoples Television Network. This is a service like these services here that's not going to come from anywhere but Canada. That service isn't coming from Raleigh, North Carolina. It just isn't. That service has 9(1)(h), and when I alluded to our having a stack of correspondence from the CRTC saying we would be heard under 9(1)(h) and we'd get a fair hearing, APTN has a stack like this of being bounced from one channel to another, their viewers not being able to find them, getting no notice of where they are—they're on 260; they're on 580; there on.... You know.
So I was alluding to my colleague that I couldn't read some of my own writing in the main presentation. But the part I was trying to get at is that I think that horse has left the barn in terms of separating specialties from having BD ownership. But at least we still have some tools like 9(1)(h), which can rebalance fairly and with some business predictability to assure diversity.