Let me start with a couple of comments, and then I'll turn it over to Paul.
First, when it comes to this particular transaction, there is no level of media concentration at all. People say that quite quickly, but in this case it's not the case at all. Bell has had an ownership position in CTV for the last ten years. It so happens that we're going from 15% ownership today back to 100%, where it was ten years ago. In the meantime, we don't own any other content assets, so it's not as though we're horizontally merging two broadcasting companies and reducing them to one. It's not reducing that diversity of voices. There are actually a lot of players in the marketplace, large and small.
And I'll give you my distributor perspective, because we operate Bell Satellite TV. We want to carry as much content as we possibly can, given the capacity that we have up in the sky through our satellites. We have hundreds of Canadian services from both large and small producers, and we want to deliver what consumers really want. By marrying this content and content from others with our world-leading networks, we're going to put Canadian content at the forefront.
I have one last point before I turn it over to Paul, which is that this is the reason in our opening statement we pointed out our deal with Radio-Canada. We're obviously not going to have an ownership position at Radio-Canada, but we want their content on our platforms because consumers want to watch it.