Well, first of all, we've campaigned very actively against fee-for-carriage, or as it became known, value-for-signal. We didn't think it was a good idea then, and we still don't think it's a good idea. We think it's a very bad idea.
We don't see how consumers would accept paying a charge for a service that, for them, has always been available for free. There is no doubt that if such a fee were imposed, it would be passed on to the consumer. So we don't see that as being a consumer-friendly situation at all. We in fact would feel that it would serve more to drive consumers away from the broadcasting system. It would put them more into a basis of subscribing to over-the-top services, going to over-the-air services, which now with digital transmission are very easy to receive. So we don't think that it's a consumer-friendly idea. We don't think that the policy put in place by the CRTC, which envisioned blackouts, was at all consistent with the Broadcasting Act, which guarantees that all Canadians can receive all the programs that are broadcast. On this, we always agreed with Global. I'll put my Canwest hat on. We just feel that overall it's not a good idea, and it's not a good policy.
Now, it remains to be seen what will happen with the court. I think the CRTC told you that they expect a decision before the end of the year. We don't know what the timing will be. If they come down with that decision, we would think that if the court did uphold the commission's jurisdiction, just given the change in the landscape, with us acquiring Canwest and with Bell proposing to acquire CTV, the commission might in fact rethink it in terms of how this would be implemented and its impact on consumers.