But not TV.
Evidence of meeting #36 for Canadian Heritage in the 41st Parliament, 2nd Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was films.
A recording is available from Parliament.
Evidence of meeting #36 for Canadian Heritage in the 41st Parliament, 2nd Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was films.
A recording is available from Parliament.
Conservative
Canadian Association of Film Distributors and Exporters
Not TV, not OTT, not digital.
Conservative
John Weston Conservative West Vancouver—Sunshine Coast—Sea to Sky Country, BC
Somebody said earlier on that most Canadians are now watching on TV, digital. Do we know the percentages?
Conservative
The Chair Conservative Gord Brown
Mr. Weston, we're going to have to wrap up.
We're now going to move to Ms. Nash and Ms. Sitsabaiesan for up to seven minutes.
Rathika Sitsabaiesan NDP Scarborough—Rouge River, ON
Thank you.
Mr. Rapkowski, I know you had more notes that you wanted to read into the record, but if you could maybe send in your complete speaking notes to the clerk, we could have them entered in as evidence for the committee. Thank you. Anything else you do want to submit, if you send it in writing, we could also have that available for us to go through and to add to the report.
My question is maybe semantics related, I'm not sure. Mr. Rapkowski, you mentioned that you'd like to see enforcement of the 1988 distribution policy, and Mr. Prasad, you mentioned that you'd like to see it strengthened. I think we've had a little bit of a breakdown, and I don't want to call it protectionism, but really it's about protecting our local industry and allowing for the growth or our local, domestic distributors.
Is the piece that we've hammered in a little bit, what you're saying, Mr. Rapkowski, namely about the enforcement of the 1988 distribution policy? Mr. Prasad, you were saying you want to strengthen it. How?
Either one of you can answer.
NDP
Rathika Sitsabaiesan NDP Scarborough—Rouge River, ON
Not now? No? Okay, you can send it in by writing if you'd like.
NDP
NDP
Rathika Sitsabaiesan NDP Scarborough—Rouge River, ON
When somebody asked about the number of jobs in the film distribution industry in Canada, I think Mr. Rapkowski said he could send that in. If you could send that number in, it would give us an idea of the number of jobs that are available in the industry today and what types of effects it could have if these large U.S. studios were allowed to continue to undermine the intent of the 1988 distribution policy.
I'll ask one more question. The rest of my time is for Peggy.
I want to ask about the technological change and the shift that's happened. I think it's been 10 years since the last study was done. You can talk about whatever timeline you'd like to.
How has that affected the work you're doing with respect to distribution? What type of legislative adjustments, if any, that you know of or can think of, need to happen to facilitate the work you're doing in distribution? If you'd like to, go on to content creators.
Canadian Association of Film Distributors and Exporters
If I can touch on a—
NDP
Peggy Nash NDP Parkdale—High Park, ON
I just want to get a couple of minutes to ask questions. I want to thank you, Mr. Rapkowski, for your explanation about the enforcement of the 1988 agreement and law. But I want to ask my question to Mr. Roy.
First of all, thank you for the role that Entertainment One plays in the Canadian market. I think your company plays a very valuable role for Canadian content and distribution.
I want to pursue the point you raised about Canadian content and TV broadcasters, that there should be a dedicated portion of Canadian content dedicated to Canadian feature film. That obviously is not happening now.
Can you describe what needs to change and what difference it would make to the industry?
President, Entertainment One Films Canada and Les Films Seville, Entertainment One
I think what's important is that we make films in Canada. Heritage Canada is helping to finance these films with tax credits, with Telefilm Canada. Then we have the CRTC; they regulate the broadcasters. But it's as if there is no link between the two, and we need to have a link, because broadcasters should buy Canadian films and offer these films to the Canadian audience.
The impact we have seen in Quebec is that the more you see these films on TV, the more you're able to reach hundreds of thousands of people at the same time, and then these people discover what Canadian films are. They love these films; then they want to see more of them and they go into theatres after that to see the next ones.
President, Entertainment One Films Canada and Les Films Seville, Entertainment One
Yes. In Quebec, we have really strong support from Radio-Canada.
President, Entertainment One Films Canada and Les Films Seville, Entertainment One
They buy, I would say, almost 90% of the French-Canadian films. They're doing really well with these films. Many people are watching them, and that has an effect on the entire business. So that's what we—
President, Entertainment One Films Canada and Les Films Seville, Entertainment One
—would like to have in English Canada.
Conservative