I look at the system right now, and it's interesting. We fell through the cracks, which is basically..... If you're a young, talented producer with a micro-budget, which is very tiny and means that you can't afford to hire any stars, you can get Telefilm funding. That's great. It gives young talent a great chance. Then I think it's interesting that if you're a producer who has made more than one feature film—so I'm still going to fall through the cracks next year—then you can't get development funding.
I just think that we're in a world now where our audience is screen agnostic. There's talent. There's Canadian YouTube talent that is getting 8 million views. There's television talent that might have something to offer to the future film world. There's young and up-and-coming talent.
I think that trying to create stiff rules and boxes is against innovation. I would suggest that Telefilm try to figure out a way to be more open to interesting people who might walk through their doors. It's tricky, though. I understand why the system is in place; it's because they want to support and build production companies.
I don't have a solution per se, except maybe that you build a little bit more funding, a pot of money for exceptional circumstances, and allow that to teach and to grow because there are a lot of exceptions in this new digital age. Right now there isn't that pot of money; you're always asking for a rule to be changed or broken.
It's being more formal about that and maybe parcelling, not all the money, but a little bit of money in an incremental way, would allow for some innovation.