No. I did receive from my ISP a free subscription to Spotify for a year as part of a wireless package. This certainly is value of music at the ISP level. I'm not sure that I can speak to any international initiatives to establish new remuneration models necessarily. I could certainly talk about evolving remuneration structures within the industry, like the publisher–label–artist relationships, if that's of interest.
To the points that were raised by SOCAN, I think it's very important to ensure that the principles that we've always based our negotiations on—the exclusive right to control how our works are used, reproduced, and performed—be technology-neutral and adaptable to changes in technology that are much more rapid than our legislative reform can possibly be. I think we need to ensure that this is addressed, both through the exemptions but also through looking at things like the private copy. Requests have been unanimous to try to make that technologically neutral, so that as people move to reproducing music on smart phones, tablets, or whatever comes next, we have a law that gives us a seat at the table, and wherever there's a commercially valuable use of our music, which we've invested in and created, we have the ability to negotiate fair value. I don't think the principles need to change, but we need to ensure that they can extend to new technologies and developments.